 |
Press Release from Nirj Deva DL MEP |
7th July
2006 |
|
Strasbourg Parliament saga “beyond a joke”
says South East MEP |
South East England MEP Nirj Deva has today (Friday) demanded answers
on revelations that the European Parliament is to spend £100 million
to stay in Strasbourg just as EU auditor reveals up to €100 million
overpaid to the city in rent scandal.
EU auditors reported that the City of Strasbourg has taken up to
€100 million more than it should from the European Parliament’s rent
budget. At the same time, Conservative MEPs were shocked to learn
that the Parliament President [Speaker] Josep Borrell has been
trying to negotiate the purchase of the Strasbourg parliamentary
buildings for a further €136 million in defiance of increasing
opposition from MEPs.
Conservative Members of the European Parliament intent on ending the
wasteful Strasbourg 'circus', lead by Delegation Leader Timothy
Kirkhope, have today written to the Parliament President Josep
Borrell demanding full disclosure of his negotiations to buy the
Parliament buildings from the City of Strasbourg, alleging that he
is steamrollering through an expensive and controversial folly
without seeking the authority of Parliament's Budgetary Control
committee and ignoring completely the continuing scandal of rent
overpayment. A Price Waterhouse Coopers report has estimated the
rent overspend at €60 million whilst an internal Parliament audit
considers that the overspend on rent over thirty years is even
greater at 'up to €100 million'*. Both figures are far higher than
the original overspend estimate of €32 million.
Nirj Deva MEP for South East England for said:
“The Strasbourg saga goes from the sublime to the ridiculous to the
downright scandalous.
“At a time when schools and hospitals in my constituency struggle to
make ends meet, this kind of staggering waste and inefficiency
really does beggar belief.
“Why is the European Parliament seriously considering paying £100
million of taxpayer’s money to a city which has already pocketed up
to €100 million too much for a building no-one wants or needs?
"It is highly suspicious. Even the Parliamentary Committee**
responsible have said in a letter to the President [Speaker] of the
Parliament that they “learned with surprise that Parliament
continues to pursue the negotiation” and demanded transparency from
him which they have not received.
"Together with my colleagues in the European Parliament and the
770,000 people across the 25 EU member states who have signed an
online petition, we believe that the Strasbourg site is a symbol of
waste and inefficiency in a Europe that is crying out for reform. We
will not stop in our resolve to stop Strasbourg.
“I would call on my constituents in the South East to sign the
online petition at www.oneseat.eu.
"We have kept the UK Government fully informed throughout this saga
but they have done absolutely nothing at any level."
In their letter to the Parliament President [Speaker] the
Conservatives said:
"We must… advise you that to proceed with the purchase is
unacceptable… but to attempt to do so without first obtaining the
all clear from the auditor is reckless, irresponsible and
democratically dubious. We demand that purchase negotiations are
terminated and full disclosures of those negotiations are revealed
to the Parliament. We remind you that, as President of the
Parliament, you must bear full responsibility."
ENDS
* Internal Auditor's Report: "The Internal Audit Service concludes
that the table as presented by the City of Strasbourg on 15th May
2006 does not provide a reliable basis for further decision-making
on the implications of the difference between the rents paid by the
European Parliament and the city."
**Working Group (Strasbourg Buildings) Committee of Budgetary
Control |
|